EFTA00040593.txt Text dataset_9 View on DOJ

This letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel outlines the discovery process, requests reciprocal discovery, and clarifies the government's position on sentencing reductions and plea offers. It also lists the types of records being provided as part of the discovery process, including financial records, travel records, and communications data.

Subject

United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN)

Sender

Acting United States Attorney

Recipients

Christian Everdell, Esq., Mark Cohen, Esq., Laura Menninger, Esq., Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq.

Document ID

20 Cr. 330 (MN)

Date

2020-08-05

Severity

suspicious

Description

The document lists various records obtained through search warrants and other legal processes related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. While the document itself doesn't describe illegal activity, the underlying investigation suggests potential illegal activities.

Content Type

court_document

This letter provides discovery pursuant to Rule 16(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ("Fed. R. Crim. P."), and seeks reciprocal discovery.'

This Office will oppose the additional one-point reduction under the Sentencing Guidelines available for defendants who plead prior to the Government's initiation of trial preparations pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b), in the event your client has not entered a plea of guilty six weeks prior to trial, or prior to the provision of 3500 material, whichever is earlier.

• The letter mentions that the Office periodically posts content on social media platforms including Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.

Context

The case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell is a high-profile case with significant media attention.

Media Worthy

Yes

• Disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States.
• Reciprocal discovery requests under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b).
• Disclosure of prior statements of witnesses under Fed. R. Crim. P. 26.2; United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 (1975).
• Policy regarding sentence reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b).
• Policy regarding plea offers and the requirements for them to be effective under Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S.Ct. 1376 (2012); Missouri v. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012).

Legal matters/litigationFinancial transactions/money flowTravel/logisticsCommunications/correspondence

Chislaine MaxwellChristian EverdellMark CohenLaura MenningerJeffrey PagliucaJeffrey EpsteinDarren IndykeRichard KahnLawrence Visoki

U.S. Department of JusticeUnited States Attorney Southern District of New YorkCohen & Gresser LLPHaddon. Morgan and Foreman, P.C.TwitterFacebookYouTubeAlaska AirlinesAmazonAmerican AirlinesAppleAT&TBank of AmericaCentury LinkCitibankDelaware Division of CorporationsLSJ LLCDelta AirlinesExpediaExperianGold Coast Federal Credit UnionGoogleInstagramJPMorgan ChaseMCCMicrosoftMoneyGramNew York State Department of StateOath HoldingsCharles SchwabShoppers TravelSouthwestCapital OneTD BankPayPalT-MobileEpstein EstateUMB BankUnited AirlinesUBS BankUSAAU.S. Virgin Islands Division of CorporationsLaurel IncMaple IncNautilus, IncVenmoVerizonWestern UnionTD Ameritrade

MarylandNew YorkU.S. Virgin Islands

Bank of AmericaCitibankGold Coast Federal Credit UnionCharles SchwabCapital OneTD BankPayPalUMB BankUBS BankUSAAVenmoWestern UnionTD Ameritrade

Tone

Professional

Purpose

To provide discovery pursuant to Rule 16(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and to seek reciprocal discovery in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.

Significance

This letter outlines the discovery process and expectations for both the prosecution and the defense in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It also addresses the government's stance on sentence reduction for acceptance of responsibility and the policy concerning plea offers.

File Name

EFTA00040593.txt

Dataset

dataset_9

Type

Text

Model

gemini-2.0-flash-001

Processed

2026-02-07T18:44:24.931708

DOJ Source

View on DOJ