EFTA00090223.txt Text dataset_9 View on DOJ

Illegal Activity
none
Blackmail
none
Date
2021-11-18
Document Type
letter
Model
gemini-2.0-flash-001
Processed
2026-02-07T18:44
Summary
The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York requests the court to quash a subpoena issued by Ghislaine Maxwell to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, arguing that the information sought is either already available, irrelevant, or inadmissible. The government contends that the subpoena is a "fishing expedition" and does not meet the legal standards for such requests.
Metadata
Subject
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (MN)
Sender
DAMIAN WILLIAMS, United States Attorney
Recipients
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
Document ID
S2 20 Cr. 330 (MN)
Date
2021-11-18
Relationships 2
Entity 1RelationshipEntity 2Description
U.S. Department of Justice Legal case Ghislaine Maxwell The U.S. Department of Justice is prosecuting Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Subpoena dispute Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP) Ghislaine Maxwell subpoenaed the administrator of the EVCP, which the government is trying to quash.
Notable Quotes 3
"[l]t was not intended by Rule 16 to give a limited right of discovery, and then by Rule 17 to give a right of discovery in the broadest terms."
"A subpoena duces tecum in a criminal case is not intended as a means of discovery."
"This subpoena request is a classic fishing expedition that the Court should quash."
Public Knowledge
Context
The case of Ghislaine Maxwell has received significant media attention.
Media Worthy
Yes
Raw Analysis JSON click to expand
Themes
Legal matters/litigation
Organizations 4
U.S. Department of JusticeUnited States AttorneySouthern District of New YorkEpstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP)
Locations 3
New YorkSouthern District of New YorkNew York, New York
Text Analysis
Tone
Professional
Purpose
To request the court to quash a subpoena issued by the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, to the administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP).
Significance
The letter outlines the government's arguments against the subpoena, citing legal precedents and arguing that the information sought is either already in the defendant's possession, irrelevant, or inadmissible.
File Info
File Name
EFTA00090223.txt
Dataset
dataset_9
Type
Text
Model
gemini-2.0-flash-001
Processed
2026-02-07T18:44:23.960527
DOJ Source
View on DOJ