EFTA01362610.txt Text dataset_10 View on DOJ

The email discusses the approach agreed upon between Wealth Management (WM) and ICG regarding client coverage, specifically when WM clients need GM product coverage. It outlines how ICG will handle orders for clients who are 'red' in ICG, and the process for getting approval for ICG to take orders in such cases.

Subject

RE: Family Office Initiative - Follow Up [I]

Sender

lain Macara

Recipients

Aamir Akram, Max Kleinert, Oliver Bettin, Tanushree Kirti, Christopher Whyton

Document ID

DB-SDNY-0052104

Date

2018-07-19

Yes, we are currently working with our KCP teams to pull together the list of WM clients where we are dependent on ICG to place orders.

If ICG does not have it's own relationship with the client, then the client would remain red in ICG - (importantly this does not mean the GM infrastructure will be closed as of course the GM business relationship remains green at the DB level by virtue of having an eligible ACO allocated)

Business dealingsCommunications/correspondence

Clifford FourieTanu Kirtilain MacaraAamir AkramMax KleinertOliver BettinTanushree KirtiChristopher WhytonKatherineStefanLouise

KCPICGWMCIBDB

Tone

Professional

Purpose

To follow up on the Family Office Initiative and clarify the approach regarding WM clients needing GM product coverage and ICG's role in taking orders.

Significance

The document outlines the agreement between Wealth Management (WM) and ICG regarding client coverage and order placement, particularly when the client status is 'red' in tradefinder.

File Name

EFTA01362610.txt

Dataset

dataset_10

Type

Text

Model

gemini-2.0-flash-001

Processed

2026-02-07T18:41:06.787453

DOJ Source

View on DOJ