EFTA01363369.txt Text dataset_10 View on DOJ

Illegal Activity

none

Blackmail

none

Date

1981

Document Type

legal filing

Model

gemini-2.0-flash-001

Processed

2026-02-07T18:41

Summary

This document is a legal filing detailing a court's decision to dismiss portions of an amended complaint alleging violations of civil rights laws, while allowing limited discovery on a Sherman Act claim. The case involves Anna and Harry Beller versus City Willets Point Contracting Corp. and Frand Mascali.

Metadata

Subject: BELLER,ANNA & HARRY BELLER v. CITY WILLETS POINT CONTRACTING CORP., & FRAND MASCALI
Sender: —
Recipients: —
Document ID: DB-SDNY-0053344
Date: 1981

Relationships 4

Entity 1	Relationship	Entity 2	Description
ANNA BELLER	legal	CITY WILLETS POINT CONTRACTING CORP.	Plaintiff vs Defendant in a civil suit
HARRY BELLER	legal	CITY WILLETS POINT CONTRACTING CORP.	Plaintiff vs Defendant in a civil suit
ANNA BELLER	legal	FRAND MASCALI	Plaintiff vs Defendant in a civil suit
HARRY BELLER	legal	FRAND MASCALI	Plaintiff vs Defendant in a civil suit

Notable Quotes 2

Whether plaintiff couches his claims for relief under the rubric of due process, equal protection or the civil rights laws, the Amended Complaint alleging violations of plaintiffs civil rights must be dismissed for failure to state a claim r27] upon which relief can be granted.

After a thorough review of the applicable law, the Court concludes that plaintiff has no cognizable claim under either 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 or 1986.

Raw Analysis JSON click to expand

Themes

Legal matters/litigation

People 6

Hamilton v. Chaffin Shore v. Howard ANNA BELLER HARRY BELLER FRAND MASCALI Zentgraf v. Texas A & M University

Organizations 3

CITY WILLETS POINT CONTRACTING CORP.Texas A & M UniversitySUPREME COURT CIVIL SUITS FOR KINGS COUNTY, NEW YORK

Locations 3

KINGS COUNTY, NEW YORKN.D.Tex.S.D.Tex.

Text Analysis

Tone: formal
Purpose: To document the court's decision on a motion to dismiss in a civil rights and Sherman Act case.
Significance: The document outlines the court's decision to dismiss claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, while allowing the plaintiff an opportunity to conduct limited discovery regarding the Sherman Act claim.

File Info

File Name: EFTA01363369.txt
Dataset: dataset_10
Type: Text
Model: gemini-2.0-flash-001
Processed: 2026-02-07T18:41:33.698325
DOJ Source: View on DOJ