The image is a scanned document listing several United States court cases. Each entry includes the case name, number, and court information.
Type: legal_filing
Full Transcription:
United States v. McDarrah, 351 F. App'x 558 (2d Cir. 2009) United States v. Medina, No. 13 Cr. 272 (PGG), 2014 WL 3057917 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 2014) United States v. Miller, 116 F.3d 641 (2d Cir. 1997) United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976) United States v. Miller, 911 F.3d 638 (1st Cir. 2018) United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d 782 (2d Cir. 1996) United States v. Mitan, No. 08-760, 2009 WL 2328870 (E.D. Pa. July 28, 2009) United States v. Mitchell, 966 F.2d 92 (2d Cir. 1992) United States v. Mitlof, 165 F. Supp. 2d 558 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) United States v. Monserrate, No. 10 Cr. 965 (CM), 2011 WL 3480957 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2011) United States v. Montoya-Eschevarria, 892 F. Supp. 104 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) United States v. Moore, 968 F.2d 216 (2d Cir. 1992) United States v. Morgan, 113 F.3d 1230, 1997 WL 268712 (2d Cir. 1997) (unpublished opinion). United States v. Mostafa, 965 F. Supp. 2d 451 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) United States v. Mulder, 273 F.3d 91 (2d Cir. 2001) United States v. Mullens, 536 F.2d 997 (2d Cir. 1976) United States v. Murgio, 209 F. Supp. 3d 698 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) United States v. Muric, No. 10 Cr. 112 (LTS), 2010 WL 2891178 (S.D.N.Y. July 13, 2010) United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1982) United States v. Napolitano, 552 F. Supp. 465 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) United States v. Nejad, No. 18 Cr. 224 (AJN), 2019 WL 6702361 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 9, 2019) United States v. Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1987) 257 261 252, 292 116, 117, 119 44 161 218 144 268 267 118 125 45 242, 243,247,262 241, 242 139 231, 241, 247 86 153, 161 241 225 233 xviii
Significance: List of court cases
The image is a scanned document, specifically a list of court cases titled "United States v. [Name]". The document is in English and consists of several lines, each representing a different case. Each line includes the case name, followed by the case number and the court where the case was heard. The document is well-lit and the text is clear and readable. The background is white. At the bottom of the page, the Roman numeral 'xviii' is visible.